Talk:Postal codes in Canada/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.


 * There is a dead link in the References, #17.
 * An active link has been found for this. ww2censor (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * There is also an error with Ref #18, which together with the dead link above leaves the Santa Claus section uncited.
 * There are now 3 active links for this section added back in September. ww2censor (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The Components of a postal code section is entirely uncited.


 * The lead is a sentence or two on the short side, and could do a better job of summarising the article I think.


 * This may be an artefact introduced by the various recent changes made to the cite templates, but the format of dates in the References section is now inconsistent.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 13:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Sufficient work has now been done to this article to allow me to close this review as a keep. --Malleus Fatuorum 13:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)