Talk:Postmodern Neopaganism

Postmodern religion, main category for Postmodern Neopaganism has been nominated to appear in Did you Know? on Wiki mainpage
Hi --Kary247 (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC) You are off to such a great start on the article [[Postmodern Religion]] that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Kary247 (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
I have carefully researched and referenced this article Postmodern Neopaganism - it connects to the article I have created Postmodern Religion which has been identified as a possible - Did You Know?. Please add ideas, edits and info. - the focus here is Neopaganism as a postmodern religion - the philosophies of postmodernism are used as a way to interpret and engage with this wonderful religious movement. The broader category that this fits into at the moment is Postmodern religion, a category that i have created and this category fits the vital category Postmodernism.

The focus on these articles is to look at different religions from a postmodern perspective using the theories of postmodern thinking. This is in no way an attempt to create new religious movements, or to displace any existing religions.

--Kary247 (talk) 14:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Capitalism
From a style perspective, why is "Postmodern Neopaganism" fully capitalised in the title and through the article, and not hyphenated, whereas "neo-paganism" is lowercase and hyphenated? Either religions are all proper nouns, and thus always up, or only formal religions are proper nouns, and thus it should be down, or only ideologies whose names are formed from proper nouns (Christianity, Buddhism, Marxism) are uppercase to match the noun they're formed from. Personally I think it should be all lowercase, and non-hyphenated, but can get consistency please? - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)