Talk:Potter Palmer

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

== Regarding the reversion of this edit by 98.118.169.103 (Talk) == This edit completely replaced the content of the article with text that had no style or layout editing whatsoever, leaving one giant and nearly unreadable paragraph. Beyond that, it shows signs of having been cribbed, and maybe in places copied verbatim, from the copyrighted sources it lists (compare this excerpt for example). I'm not saying the current article is all that much better — its copyedit and reference tags are well-deserved — but the alternative was, in my opinion, a complete mess. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)