Talk:Power hour

Already deleted
I'm not sure if you guys are aware, but this page has previously been through the deletion process, the result of which was a unanimous delete. The page is located here if you'd like to check it out, but I doubt that this page will be around long all the same. ABVS1936 04:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The Rules section seems to be the main portion of this article that could be construed as a violation of WP:NOT. The main problems, that apparently resulted in deletion last time, are "lack of sources and NPOV". Pointing out specific instance of NPOV and decorating the article with Fact requests would assist greatly in improving this article.  The significance of this game seems to be tied to its citation in several new laws being pursued in North Dakota, Texas and Minnesota (see references) Mwarren us 16:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

iPowerHour
Some parts of the article seem like they are just an ad for iPowerHour and should be removed. iPowerHour is highly suggested. and the section starting out To listen to these power hour mixes online see Play Power Hour For software details on downloads... --Bakudai (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

75.151.228.217 has been adding the unwanted links and spam, so I reverted the edits. I also left a note on their talk page. FerrousCathode (talk) 14:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Rule citations
Nickomargolies says "No citation could possibly be found for this rule" in reference to the part of the article that reads "In some cases the re-drinking of vomited liquid is acceptable behavior to stay in the running." If that is true, then perhaps it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia.

XxAvalanchexX (talk) 04:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Not a game guide
The article was full of unsourced variations that clearly did not fit the intentions of Wikipedia (GAMEGUIDE). In addition, the article was peppered with linkspam advertisements (WP:LINKSPAM). I cleaned it up, but it needs more citations. FerrousCathode (talk) 00:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The linkspam continues to be re-inserted. It has been removed by multiple editors; but continuously re-inserted by the same IP. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Controversy
There are no reliable independent sources in this section, so I am removing it. Every part of it is cited to primary sources only. Guy (Help!) 17:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've now removed this controversial text lacking secondary sources three times. Any more and people will start getting blocked. Guy (Help!) 09:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Benefits?
Changed subcategory titled 'Benefits' to 'Consequences' because seriously? Benefits? 1.127.213.79 (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)