Talk:Pr (hieroglyph)

Needs a rename
Per is not the name of any hieroglyph in existance. The proper name would be pr. However, I don't know if even then pr is notable enough to have an article on it itself. Thanatosimii 19:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Pr/Per
Even the starters, the very beginners of hieroglyphs, especially when they grab the modern dictionaries, will Understand... that Per = Pr. What is preferable is not up to me, or of concern to me. Both will continue to be used. (I assume.)

The following is the original list with the Per (hieroglyph)s. I assume this will not get vandalized. And the cabal terminology gets a whole new meaning when it becomes a "Wikepedia"–"Cabal". [But... if you can get away with it, the more power to U!]


 * Yes, even the starters will realize per is pr, however they'll also realize that per is incorrect. Thanatosimii 04:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * There Is No Cabal (TINC). We discussed this at the last Cabal meeting, and everyone agreed that There Is No Cabal. An announcement was made in Cabalist: The Official Newsletter of The Cabal making it clear that There Is No Cabal. The words "There Is No Cabal" are in ten-foot letters on the side of the 42-story International Cabal Headquarters, and an announcement that There Is No Cabal is shown at the start of every program on The Cabal Network. If that doesn't convince people that There Is No Cabal, I don't know what will. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

"Per-name" or "Per-placename" /associations
(And its a good thing no-one gets to Vote on a Rename.)...  from the SonoranDesert, Arizona... (Author of Article(or Former Article)) -Mmcannis 02:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

hieratic equivalences please
I would like to see hieratic equivalences to the heiroglyphs - not just for Pr, but for all of them. (20040302 (talk) 23:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC))