Talk:PrankStars

Disney Channel Original Series
There has been a lot of discussion on whether or not this show is actually an original series. I believe it is, because it clearly has its own page on the Disney Channel Medianet page and Disney it self released images for it. What are everyone's thoughts? --DisneyFriends (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Definitely agree that it is an original series. Looks like the show is going to have a lot of actors from other Disney Channel shows. This is a pretty useless debate unlike My Babysitter's a Vampire, The Series, a Canadian series simply airing on Disney like Life with Derek years past.  Quasy Boy  17:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

How can it be a Disney Channel Original Series when it's just a Zoo Productions and it doesn't have a Disney Channel Original Series logo at the end of the series like the other series do? Everything you stated above is just assumptions. - Alec2011 (talk) 04:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Pranks section
It is my opinion that the Pranks section (and perhaps the Pranksters section above it as well) would be better presented by being worked into the episode list. - Purplewowies (talk) 17:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Section split and series hold
I think that the episode section of the article should be removed onto a new article. It makes the page look crowded and when it builds up to more seasons, the page will be too long and will soon have to get rid of the expansion of it. Also, I changed the episode status to "present; currently unairing" because it seems that it is not airing on a schedule time and has been held back from the regular Disney Channel in America. - RomeAntic14 (Talking 2 Me?) 08:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If official word that new episodes are airing (in any country) comes this way (since they seem to have stopped there, too), I feel it still counts. I need to look in the MOS about that. I believe that someone said that the episode list should stay here until it has a certain number of episodes (a number I believe was more than 6). That's the entire reason I didn't do someting bold like moving it into another article. - Purplewowies (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Bare URL tag
It appears that the bare URL issue has been resolved, so the tag might need to be removed.--Soulparadox (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012 backlog drive
I am editing this for the Sept 2012 drive and will endeavor to complete the article by the end of the month.--Soulparadox (talk) 10:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)