Talk:Pratt & Whitney Canada

Fine
I think something about Pratt & Whitney Canada's US fine for selling technology to China. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/pratt-whitney-canada-pleads-guilty-in-military-software-case/article4377357/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattclare (talk • contribs) 01:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

1974 United Aircraft strike
I think that this defining moment in the company history should not be ignored, it literally made PWC into the fantastic company it is today. This article as it is, is barely a product list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.9.246 (talk) 07:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Pratt & Whitney Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070622155349/http://www.pw.utc.com:80/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextrefresh=1&vgnextoid=5a5212cb8c6fb010VgnVCM1000000881000aRCRD to http://www.pw.utc.com/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextrefresh=1&vgnextoid=5a5212cb8c6fb010VgnVCM1000000881000aRCRD

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Next Generation Regional Turboprop
I have moved the section "Next Generation Regional Turboprop" from Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100, because this is a new family of engines, not part of the PW100 family.

However, it's my opinion that this warrants at most a single sentence, because this engine does not yet exist. It is still in the design stage. I was going to suggest taking it out entirely, but there does seem to be enough coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * It still needs to be a single sentence, but we can keep all the refs. I'd recommend a draft article for the details. BilCat (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)