Talk:Pre-engineered building

Untitled
Any reference available to validate the 30% weight savings over conventional? Extraordinary Spaces (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

"Lighter weight equates to less steel ...." is a chicken and egg statement. Also, lower weight does not necessarily equate to less cost as implied. I can easily design a complex geometry that optimizes material but is expensive to manufacture. Some manufacturing design software does not optimize for manufactured cost as overtly as for minimized steel weight. I think that the writer may have more ideas to communicate that they have not fully developed in the statement.Extraordinary Spaces (talk) 03:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Pre Engineered buildings are the alternate solution for conventional RCC buildings in industrial applications. It has lot of advantages like, faster construction, easy design, comparitively less cost etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagathnivasan (talk • contribs) 13:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Supplier details
http://www.interarchbuildings.com/pre-engineered-metal-buildings.asp

[http://www.bajajngp.com/pre-engineered-metal-buildings manufacturer

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yndesai (talk • contribs) 5 January 2015 (UTC)