Talk:Preca

Deletion
This article is gains most of its content unreservedly and without alteration from the society website, which means that it is mostly vandalized. This is evinced by the structure, which is identical to that of the correctly named George Preca article which was recently rewritten for having been vandalized and incredibly POV. This brings up a second issue, namely, that a better-named and better written article exists for the same subject at George Preca. Lastly, it is an orphan. See Talk:George Preca. Alekjds talk 06:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)