Talk:Predatory educator

Review of draft
You can and should state names of organizations that have been called predatory educators. You do not need separate sources for every institution, but you should have multiple reliable sources that agree with the label. It is also necessary to include any rebuttals made by the institutions themselves, as well as any available sources that defend the institutions.

The tone of the introduction (and also "Underlying issues") may be inappropriate for Wikipedia. The article needs to have sourced statements about how often students quit their jobs and what their prospects are like on graduation; if there aren't numbers, the statement can't be made. The section "underlying issues" needs to be well-sourced, and you should avoid any original research (see WP:OR and especially WP:SYNTH). It is important that both sections allow the reader to form their own opinion.

There are some missing commas and there are some style issues. Avoid unnecessary words; don't write "One common example would be," or "when it comes to education." See the Manual of Style at WP:MOS for (much) more on this. Roches (talk)