Talk:Predictive engineering analytics

AFC Review
I puzzles me that there is any doubt that this article is suitable for inclusion. The user who wrote it should be commended for a detailed and well-sourced article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * @Oiyarbepsy thanks for your input. Would you please do the necessary finishing touches such as categories, wikilinks, etc.
 * The answer to your puzzlement is that none of your fellow engineering topic specialists are bothering to do any reviewing at AFC. For a non-specialist such as myself it can be very hard to judge whether a topic is gibberish or truly notable or might already be covered in another article or original research, or any number of other reasons why it should not be accepted.
 * Thanks for helping and please feel free to pop over to AFC when you have a few minutes free, you might find a few good articles among the junk submissions that constantly stream in. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Dear Oiyarbepsy, thank you a lot! I appreciate your comment! @Roger (Dodger67), a lot of topics can be linked to this, and it fits some categories. I'd love to do that! Unfortunately, being new at wikipedia, I am still struggling a bit with the practical execution :-) BartVanLierde (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)