Talk:Preface (liturgy)

"Inaccurate" and "more accurate" translations?
I am little concerned and suspect POV. The article talks about two different translations for the Preface. The first translation is said to be "the current, imprecise" translation, while the second is called "more accurate." No sources are cited in support. This strikes me as POV and if there are no objections I will try to change the article accordingly. I believe it would be possible to talk about the two different translations without disparaging one or the other... unless, of course, someone has a reliable secondary source to support calling one "imprecise" and the other "more accurate." Jwhosler (talk) 17:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Also, it says "the current translation". That is only true in England and Wales, until Nov. 29 2011. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Rhyming Preface?
This is listed as a "common Lutheran practice." I am not aware of a single parish which practices such nonsense. Please cite references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LutheranOrganist (talk • contribs) 14:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Not actually the preface
Other than in the Anglican example, there is not actually any example of a *preface* given. The Dominus vobiscum and Sursum corda are not really part of the Preface. Can anyone provide an actual Byzantine or Lutheran preface? Steepleman (t) 00:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)