Talk:Preise, Jerusalem, den Herrn, BWV 119/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Smerus (talk · contribs) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Well written
Overall absolutely acceptable. Two quibbles which I would raise:
 * History and words - 'Bach could count on the entire council (his employer) listening, and likely also civil servants' - 'probably' is better than 'likely' in colloquial English.
 * Scoring and structure - I suggest adding 'the musicologist' or 'the editor' before 'Alfred Durr' so that it is clear where this is coming from.

Verifiable with no original research
Well sourced and cited as one would expect from this editor.

Broad in its coverage, Neutral
Exemplary on both counts and well-focussed.

Stable
No problems

Images
Appropriate images and clear tables

Summary
I have no problems in passing this for GA, but the editor might like to take a look at the two quibbles under "Well-written".--Smerus (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, done, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Excellent, super article.--Smerus (talk) 11:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)