Talk:Prespa National Park (Albania)

There is another national park with the very same name in the Greek side of the border []. The title should change to reflect this condition.Alexikoua (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC) According to this [][] the Prespa National Park is a tri-national park. Albania is one of the countries. Thus the article needs to describe the non-Albanian part of the park.Alexikoua (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * That can be remedied through a clarification of the pagename: Prespa National Park (Albania). The pagename then can be used as the generic page Prespa National Park for the wider trinational park that says some things about it relating to all 3 countries. So far the Albanian portion of the park has an article fully developed. If other editors want to write up articles on the portion of the park in the other respective countries they can do so. Best.Resnjari (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Nice. We have an agreement on my first proposal about a move then.Alexikoua (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It's a good idea to rename the article in Prespa National Park (Albania); (similar case with Glacier National Park in Canada and the United States).--Lorik17 (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅., add a sentence (somewhere where you think it belongs) to the article about this park being part of/or an extension of the bigger Prespa national Park. Use RS sources you find or the ones listed by that other editor in the discussion. Best.Resnjari (talk) 20:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, hope you're all safe and well. I agree with Resnjari's move, these are three different parks. The transboundary Prespa project was a planned park, but it has never actually been implemented. It has de facto been abandoned by all those involved in favor of the larger Prespa-Ohrid ecoregion.--Maleschreiber (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , do you have a RS source that says it was abandoned. If so, i'll correct some things for the article. Best.Resnjari (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

"Exactly 10 years after the declaration, this process culminated in the signing of a legally binding quadrilateral agreement by the Ministers of Environment of Albania, Greece, the fYR of Macedonia and the EU Commissioner for the Environment. Oddly enough, the signing of this agreement was followed by a period of less intensive state co-operation in the WPA, which has lasted until very recently, due to the fact that Greece only ratified the agreement in spring 2017. Nevertheless, local actors, especially the NGOs, but also the local municipalities, have kept transboundary co-operation alive during these years. Furthermore, in 2014 the parts of the Prespa basin in Albania and the fYR of Macedonia, together with Lake Ohrid, were designated as a bilateral Transboundary Biosphere Reserve under the UNESCO Man and Biosphere programme."--Maleschreiber (talk) 16:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I used the expression little progress has been made per Gardin (2007). It's a bit old, so you can also use the report of the Prespa-Ohrid Nature Trust about the signing of the preliminary agreement which even formally was completed in 2017: