Talk:Pretzel Pezzullo/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 19:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article today. I will be leaving comments within the hours. —Michael Jester (talk &#183; contribs) 19:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

—Michael Jester (talk &#183; contribs) 03:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Is there anyway you can move the citations out of the lead, per WP:LEADCITE?
 * Moved the height and weight, kept the nickname reference because it is able to be challenged, and the sentence flows with the lead.
 * Fair enough.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * A couple of sentence are missing a citation:
 * "Pezzullo was born on December 10, 1910, in Bridgeport, Connecticut."
 * "Combined, Pezzullo went 14–10 with a 5.19 ERA."
 * "He went 5–16 the following year, before leaving the team for the Syracuse Chiefs and the Buffalo Bisons in his final year of professional baseball in 1941."
 * Fixed.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Google Image Search shows some pictures of Pezzullo. Can you upload one with a fair use rationale?
 * Added.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Google Image Search shows some pictures of Pezzullo. Can you upload one with a fair use rationale?
 * Added.


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Once these comments are address, the article will pass.

Cool. It looks like this passes GA-criteria. Good job on the article.03:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)