Talk:Preussen-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 10:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * shouldn't "German navy" be italicsed?
 * No, it'd only be italicized if I used the German name (Kaiserliche Marine) - one wouldn't italicize US Navy either. Parsecboy (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * "much faster" replace with "much more quickly"
 * Substituted. Parsecboy (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Assessment
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I've very happy with this article – expertly-written, follows MoS, illustrated by good images, and the like. I hope this article can get the Star. If Parsecboy would like advice, please ask me.  Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 01:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * End note