Talk:Price v. United States

Opening para
The lead para omits the most important aspect of the case -- what, in fact, the court ruled. That's like writing about Brown v. Board of Education without mentioning that segregation was found to be unconstitutional. 71.175.4.207 (talk) 18:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Unclear
As the previous poster said 10 years ago, it's not clear of the contents of the case and the verdict. Is there any way to make clearer what the actual case entailed and what the results were?

It seems that the artwork was purchased by a Mr. Price, but the US thought that they actually owned it for some reason, having removed it after WW2? Logical outcome (to me), is that the person who bought the art owns the art, but was that the result? What was the actual verdict here? 177.194.178.151 (talk) 05:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)