Talk:Primera División de México Bicentenario 2010

The thing you say one article per season not true. Every single season has an article all you are doing is erasing and the seasons in mexican primera is not like La liga is not a full year season.


 * You got it wrong on two things.


 * 1) Seasons (temporadas) are full years. Tournaments (torneos) are half years. The Bicentenario is a tournament. The Apertura+Bicentenaerio is the season.
 * 2) It has previously been agreed upon, by consensus, to merge articles on multiple championships season because of certain information that pertains to the entire season (teams, changes, relegation, etc). Go look at Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay as examples of how seasons articles with multiple championships are being done (the naming convention is off, but that's in the process of being agreed upon). Mexico was the next big league due for a merger. Digirami (talk) 03:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

It was agreed upon yourself from what I see I already did merge both seasons(tournaments) 2 days ago. But no you have to be such and hog that u keep redirecting it to yours and yes way before u even said it i checked out those articles Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay looks like you did edits  almost on all of them i don't touch none of those because i don't know anything about it. So don't be such a diva and let at least one article that was done(updated) 1st alone. I actually watch the Mexican Soccer games and I keep updated and I may be wrong but i don't think you even watch them you just want it your way thats all. And if anything is not in place in the article ill be sure to fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkonghello (talk • contribs) 07:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * No, it was not agreed upon by me. There was a discussion in a separate talk page months ago several users came to a consensus. I simply help facilitate the changes. The reason I keep redirecting to the article I created is because it is better in design and information than the one you created. All the necessary information is there using common templates used in every league season article (which is probably why you copied most of the information I added). In addition, the season article I created has no spelling, formatting, or grammar errors. Additionally, the season article wasn't copied and pasted from the Spanish article, which contains some errors to being with.
 * I don't have to watch the games to keep the information updated and correct. I just have to make sure my edits are correct, which they are. And you are not the only one who will keep the season article page updated (be sure of that). Digirami (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Several user doesn't matter wikipedia is not restricting anything (and i did follow the merge rule you top editors did...O) so is fair game unless you start tearing up to wikipedia. And yes It was copied from wikipedia onto wikipedia (Not another source) and for sure not from your edits and i actually tweak and did edits myself. And yeah it was a little some(not from yours ) but don't you think a Mexicans doing Apertura Mexicana knows better than a South American from the south that all he wants is for him to have it his way Im not saying is against anything but your just being capricious in doing that. Tell me what is so wrong in what they have in their article you came at the article that was on first understand you came at me first without notice so after all that time spent is okay to let someone else have it their way. And hah I never said I'm going to be the only one you told me that I have some errors so I said (ill be sure to fix it) but i never named myself the owner so no matter your speculations and anything you say will keep on. Kkonghello (talk  —Preceding undated comment added 00:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC).