Talk:Primitive (geometry)

I suggest this page be merged with the geometric primitive page.

~KM
 * I don't see any reason not to merge, but I don't know the topic well enough to decide which is the better title. The article at [Geometric primitive] seems better written. (I'm not the same KM, by the way.) --Kineticman 05:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I think there is a significant technical difference between the primitives of computer graphics and the primitives of formal geometry, although they are closely linked conceptually (the 'simplest thing possible'). However, since both topics discuss both, with different degrees of success, I see no reason not to combine to two (and perhaps clarify the difference between the two?) Kvetch 00:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That said, I think that Primitive (Geometry) is a better primary page than Geometric Primitive since it is clearer that the concept in question doesn't usually have the 'geometric' descriptor appended. Kvetch 00:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)