Talk:Prince Bishops of Durham

Proposed Merger
This article is rather bare, and I can't see a reason why we should need to have a separate article from the Bishop of Durham one (with fewer links and details). It also gives unnecessary confusion between Prince Bishop and Prince Bishops unsigned


 * I'd be against that - while some Bishops of Durham have been 'Prince Bishops' they are not the same. The secular powers of the Bishops in the Palatinate were so atypical for England they should be in their own article. Paulleake 20:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair point; this article is still rather empty, though, so perhaps a bulk copy of relevant bits from the Bishop of Durham page to here would be better. It should certainly have a link between them.


 * I've added in some more links between some of the connecting pages; this article still needs bulking out, though; probably by making it a subarticle of Bishop of Durham (or vice versa), and copying the relevant bits from that article into this.