Talk:Prince Emmanuel of Belgium

Redirection to Prince Philippe, Duke of Brabant
Being bold in a redirection may be fine, but when somebody reverts, it's appropriate to discuss the matter (cf. BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. User:Charles thinks that this individual is not notable, while User:Morhange thinks that he is. The fact that there are articles on him in three other language versions of Wikipedia suggests that other people also think he is notable (but they may all be wrong). Noel S McFerran (talk) 00:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I contend that the young prince is a notable element in his father's life and article but not as a standalone article at this time. The prince is little more than two years old and has hasn't done much other than be born. If the prince was, God forbid, the subject of something like a kidnapping plot or known for more than just having a rather regal name then I could understand the need for an article. However, everything that may make the prince even interesting is best covered in article on those notable topics, such as his father, mother, paternal grandparents and place in the Belgian royal succession. That he is a common element in any of those articles does not indicate a need for this article, which is simply a summary of information best covered elsewhere for now. Charles 01:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prince Emmanuel of Belgium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20070812090759/http://www.popularq.net/articles/Royalty/General/Prince-Emmanuel-was-christened-on-Saturday/ to http://www.popularq.net/articles/Royalty/General/Prince-Emmanuel-was-christened-on-Saturday/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)