Talk:Prince Family Paper/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 00:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall this is a good article, though I do have a couple nitpicks:
 * The two sentences on Darwinism (in the lead and body, repsectively) sound virtually identical and therefore repetitive; reword one to mix it up a bit.
 * I changed it up a bit, but let me know if you think it needs to be more clear. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  02:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * "They didn’t let Michael off the hook. Instead the writers took a dark and dirty turn toward the truly tragic, in the literal sense of the word." <- I'm nitpicky on quotes having cites at the end of the respective sentence, even though I'm positive it uses the same ref as the next sentence. Same with a couple others.
 * I think I got them all, but if I missed any let me know. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  02:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

This is all I have though. I'll put it on hold and pass it when it's fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 00:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good, article passes. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 02:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)