Talk:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator:

Reviewer: Tim O'Doherty (talk · contribs) 13:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Review coming soon. Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 13:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Tim O'Doherty I hope you will help me wrap up Charlotte's GA review before we proceed with this one? Regards MSincccc (talk) 13:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @MSincccc - There are still some things to do in Charlotte's first, namely the unreliable refs and some of the prose comments, which should be fairly quick to resolve. Don't worry: I can manage two GANs simultaneously. Cheers, Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 13:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Tim O'Doherty I did implement the changes in the prose and requested you to help me with the two refs as I could not find them on Google myself. Regards MSincccc (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Please keep discussions about other articles limited to their own space. Keivan.f  Talk 15:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Keivan.f Charlotte's article has been passed as GA. So, no worries about that now. I hope that being one of the prime authors of Philip's article I can help with the GA process. Regards MSincccc (talk) 15:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

I will note that there is a [page needed] tag in the arms section. Can this be added? Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I will look at it tomorrow. I had searched for an online version of the book before, but I have to redo it since it seems that I don't have the information on hand anymore. Keivan.f  Talk 03:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Can't find a copy of the book anywhere. I have asked another major contributor for their input but I'm afraid it they don't have access to it, then I might have to remove that part. It is not unsourced, but is not 'precisely' sourced either. I guess I'll just hide the text. Keivan.f  Talk 21:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Turns out no one has access to the book at the moment. I just hid the text in the hope that someone might be able to access it in the future. Keivan.f  Talk 03:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Well I had fixed a whole lot of parameters and cleaned up spaces which were unnecessarily taking up a lot of space. By the way, @Keivan.f what does Tim mean by "third cousins through Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom and second cousins once removed through King Christian IX of Denmark - this link is freakishly long: can it be more strategically placed?" as no such sentence exists in the article as per WikiBlame. That's the only prose-related comment yet to be resolved. Regards MSincccc (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Took care of it. Keivan.f  Talk 04:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Apologies, time got away from me. Spotcheck tomorrow. Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Spotcheck
Forgot about thissorry. Doing now. Few issues to sort out, and wondering what went wrong with Brandreth. Might just be using the wrong edition here. Happy to be corrected. CheersTim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1(a) - ✅
 * 21 - ✅
 * 41 - (found on Internet Archive) - says 10 July: is this wrong?
 * The articles Elizabeth II and Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten cite page 77 of Heald's 2007 book Princess Margaret: A Life Unravelled (which is incidentally cited in this page as well) and give the date as 9 July. Has the author contradicted himself?
 * 61 - assume this works with the other source.
 * The London Gazette is fine. Once you open it up there's a link to a PDF. The information is given in the second column on that page.
 * 81 - IA link, can't find it
 * 101 - ✅
 * 121 - again can't find it: is there something wrong with the editions? The one I'm using is 2004.
 * 141 - ✅
 * 161 - ✅
 * 181 - ✅
 * 201 - ✅
 * 221 - ✅
 * 241 - Heald yes, Brandreth no.
 * Don't have access to the hardcover now, but since you have access to the archived version I do wonder whether you have the same problem verifying the info on the page Elizabeth II. Because the book is cited there too and there is overlap between the two articles. I'm trying to figure out what the issue is.
 * Yes, was the wrong version. The other works just fine. Will have a look over the full thing tomorrow. Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Tim O'Doherty I did add the URL, ISBN, and page numbers as suggested by DrKay on your talk page. However, please take another look as I may have overlooked or made a mistake. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, there was an error. You should have altered it within the bibliography section. User:Neveselbert already took care of it. Keivan.f  Talk 20:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)