Talk:Prince Sigismund of Prussia (1864–1866)

Untitled
For a August 2005 deletion debate see Votes for deletion/Prince Sigismund of Prussia

This article ought to be moved to Prince Sigismund of Prussia (1864-1866). This little fellow's nephew, the son of Prince Heinrich, who actually lived to adulthood, is probably more significant. john k 13:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Until the other Prince Sigismund has an article, I don't think that it is an issue. But this article could always be moved to Prince Franz Friedrich Sigismund of Prussia, yes a long title, but that was his full name. Prsgodd e ss187 13:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but he isn't called Franz Friedrich Sigismund. He was just called Sigismund. That would be a bad title, because it would be misleading, like having Victoria at "Alexandrina Victoria". The dates is a much better way to go. At any rate, this page ought to at least be a disambiguation page, because as it is now a) it implies that this is the only Prince Sigismund; and, more importantly b) any links intended to go to the other Prince Sigismund will go here. john k 22:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

This was very confusing when I first read this. I do Royalty genealogy and it confused the heck out of me having 2 people with the same name on the same page. I think it would be easier to understand if we were to split the articles or make more of a seperation or something. I'm still a little confused as to which person was which. Prince Stephen 17:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

I fail to see the relevance in the fact that Sigismund was the first of Queen Victoria's grandchildren who died. /Robert Warholm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.209.42.235 (talk) 07:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)