Talk:Prince of Persia (Ubisoft video game)

I think someone should probably add a plot section, even though there is already one in existance on the Prince of Persia page.--Gundor Twintle Fluffy 17:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PoP360.jpg
Image:PoP360.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal
I think this article should be merged with the main Prince of Persia article. There are not enough differences between this remake and the original and therefore the game is not notable enough to warrant it's own article. The article's status as a stub illustrates this. It could be easily placed in the main page between the Prince of Persia and Live-action film sections.  ChimpanzeeUK  - User | Talk | Contribs 11:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. It would make more sense to merge with the original Prince of Persia (1989 video game) article if anything. Retodon8 (talk) 18:52, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You're probably right. Merging with the original game's article would make more sense. I'll change it.  ChimpanzeeUK  - User | Talk | Contribs 13:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

YOU SHOULD WRITE WHICH COME FIRST AND WHICH COMES LAST

AND I THINK SOME PARTS ARE MISSING —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.237.186.120 (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What?  ChimpanzeeUK  - User | Talk | Contribs 13:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've merged. -- The Guy complain edits 06:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)