Talk:Princess Louise of Belgium

Louise-Marie?
"Princess Louise-Marie"? The metro station and the street are just "Louise". The recent biography by Defrance is Louise de Saxe-Cobourg-Gotha: Amours, argent, procès. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. Note that WP:NCPDAB discourages years as qualifiers for people, so if anyone can think of a better qualifier for the current Princess Louise, be bold. --BDD (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

current Princess Louise of Belgium → Princess Louise of Belgium (b. 2004)
 * Princess Louise Marie of Belgium → Princess Louise of Belgium – Absolutely no source for "Princess Louise Marie of Belgium" other than wikipedia. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 13:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC) The Emperor&#39;s New Spy (talk) 14:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Question. And what will happen about the current page Princess Louise of Belgium? It's already taken. --RJFF (talk) 07:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Move the lesser known Princess Louise to Princess Louise of Belgium (b. 2004) and this one to Princess Louise of Belgium.--The Emperor&#39;s New Spy (talk) 17:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Support, She's called "Louise" in Burke's Guide to the Royal Family, p.257; The Descendants of King George I, p.523; Le Petit Gotha, pp.284, 906. FactStraight (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - per Google Books quick survey. And also support current Princess Louise of Belgium → Princess Louise of Belgium (b. 2004) per nom multiple move clarification. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Louise of Belgium
This article, while entertaining, clearly does not rise to the standards that one would expect in a Wikipedia bibliography. For one thing, its English is atrocious, sometimes risibly so. 2600:1011:B165:5CA6:0:42:95E0:8401 (talk) 04:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)