Talk:Principality of Nitra/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 23:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

, thank you for your review. I moved the picture. I hope the problem is fixed. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The blockquote from Annals of Fulda looks odd. I think it is because of the image alongside it. I'm not sure how this can be fixed, but as is it is difficult to discern that the quote is a blockquote and not part of the summary text.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Article contains some tags.
 * Thank you. The relevant texts are modified. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag:, , , , , , , , , , ,
 * Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright law, so I cannot fix the problem. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 12:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag:, , , , , , , , , , ,
 * Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright law, so I cannot fix the problem. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 12:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Attribution to the authorship of the following image is lacking:
 * Sorry, I do not have information on the authorship of the image. Borsoka (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll mark the picture as "anonymous."-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 12:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall: Clean up the tags, resolve the formatting/readability issue regarding the one blockquote, and address the minor issues regarding the image tagging. After those issue are resolved, the article will satisy requirements for GA status.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 23:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Issues resolved, article passed.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 12:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Pass/Fail: