Talk:Prior Lake, Minnesota

Untitled
Regarding the recent change by User:64.122.62.226, it removed the reference to the book "Another Planet", which is a rather noteable piece of history for the town. It has been cited for vandalism before. Also, I've used that IP before (it's for the public high school in the area, or at least was one of them recently), and know vandalism has occurred from there before. So, with all that, I'm going to revert the last change. If anyone disagrees, feel free to discuss. --Mathwizard1232 07:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted another change by the same ip (from PLHS). I believe it was fairly blatant POV. I realize that the current article isn't the best, but I don't believe that was an improvement. I would encourage the person(s) from PLHS to create an account and/or actually talk about the issue. I'm interested in who it is from the high school, although I have some guesses. --Mathwizard1232 14:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Moved from main article
"22.3% were non-families" is insulting to gay and lesbian couples with or without children. A more sensitive (and accurate) text would be "22.3% were non-traditional families and other" • Comment moved from main article to talk page—see history of article. ●DanMS 04:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Improvements
I'm going to spear-head improvements for this article and may create a South of the River category or some kind of subcategory focusing on the southern suburbs since our histories are all interlinked. .:DavuMaya:. 18:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

They could stand to improve the pollution in the lake. Its getting a little rough much like the Jack Haugens methods of running a town. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/. (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Priorlakelogo.gif
Image:Priorlakelogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)