Talk:Priscilla McLean

Close connection tag
contacted me on my talk page to request the removal of the close contributor tag on the article. After looking over this discussion with, while it may be that PriscillaAnne has a close connection with the subject of the current article, it appears that the promotional concerns there about the tone of the content have been addressed for now. The editor has acknowledged the importance of neutrality in articles. Therefore, unless there are additional contributions by the editor that need review on this article, I do not believe the close contributor tag is necessary right now, and I have removed it. Cyphoid, if you think it is best to keep something for the sake of vigilance, I think we can consider an alternative such as Template:Connected contributor for use on this talk page. What do you think? I, JethroBT drop me a line 18:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I trust your judgment and yield. Thanks for your input! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll wait to hear back from her for a bit to see whether the talk page tag may be more appropriate.  Either way, thanks for cleaning up the article.  I, JethroBT  drop me a line 18:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm the one who originally placed the tag. While the prose has been trimmed back, I continue to be very wary of Priscilla influencing this article's contents. It's obvious the account PriscillaAnne was created for the sole purpose of promoting the subject and her husband. The article still contains an enormous list of works that I can only assume is here for SEO purposes. As far as I'm concerned, it should be reverted back to this revision before the COI editing began. -- Laser brain  (talk)  18:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)