Talk:Prison–industrial complex/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) 21:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Closed due to inactivity.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Closed due to inactivity.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Closed due to inactivity.
 * Closed due to inactivity.

Reviewers Comments
Before embarking on this review can or other interested editor please confirm they still wish to go through the GAR process? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'd tried pinging Kylaj on the talk page back in February, but they never responded. The class itself ended about ten days ago, so I'm not sure that she will come back. I'll try to make sure to emphasize more to students the amount of time and effort needed for GA review. It's typically not something I recommend for students because of how much this requires, to be honest. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As such, I have no problem with you closing this if you like - I don't know that they're going to respond offhand. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)