Talk:Prithu/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The first sentence of the lead needs to be rewritten; it is too complex and should probably be rewritten into two sentences. The problem lays in that the listing of alternative names breaks up the sentence so the flow is lost. Also, in the main text the sentence "However, The Manu Smriti calls the earth (Prithvi) as Prithu's wife, instead of his daughter, thus was the name Prithvi from her husband's name." doesn't make sense to me. Could you please rewrite it. Otherwise I have done some minor copyediting.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Remeber to use cite book whenever citing a book. There were three instances that didn't comply, but I have fixed them up.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Two sentences to fix up and the article will pass. If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to state them here. Arsenikk (talk)  12:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Since the concerns have been addressed, I hereby declare this article Good. Congratulations! Arsenikk (talk)  13:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Two sentences to fix up and the article will pass. If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to state them here. Arsenikk (talk)  12:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Since the concerns have been addressed, I hereby declare this article Good. Congratulations! Arsenikk (talk)  13:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)