Talk:Private label rights

2 Questions
With private label rights, can I for example use this articles found at PLR, without a problem?

Also, could someone please add a Private Label Rights textual copyright notice for example purposes? Thanks in advance. Rich (talk) 10:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment
What a terrible article. I hope someone who knows more about this has time to rewrite it correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.93.142 (talk) 11:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

The following sentence: "While licenses differ with each author and seller, the basic premise is that the license permits buyers to re-brand the content under their own name and brand (excluding copyright)," raises issues from a technical legal perspective. In paticular the parenthetical "(excluding copyright)" does not make sense because what is often licensed is licensed under copyright. If the person who wrote that could give a bit of insight about what they were trying to express with the paranthetical I would be happy to help revise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reneelloyd (talk • contribs) 17:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Expansion
I've cleaned up the article as best I could (removing advertising). It could probably be expanded a bit with a History and Criticism section; and possibly its affiliation with online marketing/spamming. --UnneededAplomb (talk) 04:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Update coming
I'm preparing an update but the problem is that there are no published materials for this license. Everything is still pretty much "wild west" and everyone's publishing what they like. - DM 16:04 (UTC) - 18. Januar 2011

Complete overhaul
I've completely rewritten the text and added criticism. I've also added three links as examples - if someone thinks they're too much, do remove them. - DM 14:45 19. Januar 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmurko (talk • contribs)