Talk:Privatization

We should put the opinions from IGM Forum European Economists
Absolute Majority agreed about Privatization in Eastern Europe which was strong Positive Some economists wrote down "this is No brainer" I think this source is useful http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/privatization-in-central-and-eastern-europe Shfur0306 (talk) 12:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Privatization unquestionably allowed corruption to take greater hold in eastern europe. The mechanism is obvious: while state capitalism implied concentrated corruption intranationally, privatization allowed corruption to flow into these countries internationally.
 * Eastern europe is not filled with miracle economies like the spanish miracle or the chinese miracle. The contrast should be obvious, and it would have been famous otherwise. Houseratz (talk) 15:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

they lies if they sad. The boss is in the jsilhe can't be injail Because ittreind of then.boss and boy soliestheylessonthem instead oofme Because it my power 41.116.8.232 (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * the man's are jelouse all of them.that got gurus and that don't have gurus so liesabout boss helping themfor4000peoplesthat staying with my enemies soliesabdhoy foessamething behind my back no body injail lies it theirfreind 41.116.8.232 (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Why no mention of how privatization is imposed upon poorer countries?
There is a specific mechanism created by IMF, World Bank and USA to impose privatizations on the poorer countries, it even has an article here in wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Consensus

So, why is there no mention here? This article is like as if privatization is a matter of taste. It's not! 79.166.6.229 (talk) 22:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)