Talk:Privilege of Evil

Fair use rationale for Image:Amorphis-priviligeofevil.jpg
Image:Amorphis-priviligeofevil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Re-release upset the band?
The article states, "On the EP's reissue by Relapse Records, the band became upset to hear that their early material was released."

The reference is to a album review where the reviewer says, "I read somewhere that Amorphis themselves was upset to discover Relapse had re-released these demo recordings that showed the band in their earliest developmental state."

I doubt this qualifies as good reference. Thoughts? Zppdppd (talk) 08:54, 6 December 2011 (UTC)