Talk:Pro-abortion movements

R from incorrect name
Hi, StAnselm. Congratulations, as of this edit you're in violation of ArbCom's 1RR restriction on record at WP:General sanctions/Abortion/Log. I cordially invite you to self-revert.

As to the R from incorrect name template, I know this is incompatible with the worldview of the Christian right-wing, but yes, this name is entirely incorrect. People who support legal access to abortion are not "pro-abortion", and the attempt to pretend otherwise is a political demonization tactic unworthy of showing its face on Wikipedia. You should be ashamed of yourself, frankly. —chaos5023 (talk) 05:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Pro-abortion activists rally in Argentina and Pro-abortion group fined indicate that the phrase is used in mainstream media. Regardless of whether it is the most neutral title, it certainly isn't "incorrect". StAnselm (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Those two links aren't greatly compelling, but my own sourcing statistics research over at Talk:Abortion-rights movements is.  I'm afraid I have to downgrade my evaluation of this redirect from "incorrect" to "hideously overblown propagandist POV", yes.  Whenever 24 hours is up, feel free to re-remove the template, I won't revert. —chaos5023 (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Third opinion
Hi. I removed the third opinion request that had been posted, since I see there is a currently open move request. So I don't see that there's a need to offer a third opinion about whether it should be moved and how it should be tagged. Thanks. Formerip (talk) 19:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abortion-rights movements which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)