Talk:Probal Dasgupta

"Sources"
Thank you for noticing the poorly referencing; is it okay now? If nobody protests I'll take away the template.--Ziko (talk) 10:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

To me too, it seems adequately sourced. (By the way, the template says "June 2011", but I don't see a recent objection to the article: is the date automatically updated?) In any case, I think the template can be removed. Giridhar (talk) 13:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

ISBNs
The list of works has a couple of notices that read

"This 1595692142 lacks ISBNs for the books listed in it. Please make it easier to conduct research by listing ISBNs. If the or  templates are in use, you may add ISBNs automatically, or discuss this issue on the talk page." and

"This 978-1595692146 lacks ISBNs for the books listed in it. Please make it easier to conduct research by listing ISBNs. If the or  templates are in use, you may add ISBNs automatically, or discuss this issue on the talk page."

What a ridiculous wording. 1595692142 and 978-15959692146  are  ISBNs, namely, the 10- and 13-digit ISBNs, respectively, of Dasgupta's most recent book, Loĝi en homaj lingvoj: la substancisma perspektivo. I guess putting ISBNs in double French brackets is not the way to go. But the ISBNs are (at least for that book) not lacking. --Haruo (talk) 03:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)