Talk:Proceedings of SPIE

The journal (or even proceeding) should be mentioned with a stub, not only with a link
In the most of cases, the reader look for a paper, not for SPIE. The shorter is chain of links, the better. dima 04:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Please confirm classification
The WikiProject classification for Proceedings of SPIE is. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set Stub on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 18:48, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Stub. . If you think it looks like a stub (see WP:JWG), just update the talk page, or just leave a message on the talk page. Removing the stub template + leaving a talk page message for others to re-add the stub template and update the talk page templates is tedious. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I will do that for the most obvious cases (like this one).  ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  19:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)