Talk:Proci

Object to deletion
As a neutral party who just chanced upon this artifle in Afd, I think the subject matter is notable enough (discrete category of characters in a major literary work) to warrant inclusion in Category:Odyssey. A re-title to English might be appropriate, but not a delete. MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * This article is just a list (and one ultimately derived from Apollodorus, not Homer). Why is this useful to the reader? --Akhilleus (talk) 03:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Almost all the people on the list are notable enough to have their own articles, and there is at least some context given in the headings. I agree it could use some fleshing out, and if there is an accepted English term more used than Proci I could see a re-name.  It just doesn't seem as useless, non-notable, or cluttering as pretty much any article in Afd.  Again, I'm not a Greek Lit guy, but as a neutral outsider I found the article/list reasonably informative and notable. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

This needs to be redirected to Suitors of Penelope, or vice versa. &mdash; Anonymous Dissident  Talk 04:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It should be at Suitors of Penelope; "Proci" is not a term one encounters in current scholarship on Homer, and the general reader has zero reason to expect that this article would be under the Latin word for suitors.


 * Actually, it should probably be at List of suitors of Penelope... --Akhilleus (talk) 04:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, there's already text at Suitors of Penelope, so I'm just going to take whatever's useful in this article, copy it over there, and then make this a redirect. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)