Talk:Procurators of Saint Mark

Requested move 11 November 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 06:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Procurator of St Mark's → Procurators of Saint Mark – Suggest that the page currently entitled "Procurator of Saint Mark's" be amended to "Procurators of Saint Mark". Admittedly, the Italian could be translated either way. But I looked at several sources by major English-speaking historians, and I find it only as "Procurators of Saint Mark", without the genitive. Venicescapes (talk) 15:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Support, though there might be a case for the singular? Fwiw, the French and Dutch wiki titles don't have the genitive, and are singular, but the Italians use the plural. Johnbod (talk) 15:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I had also thought about the singular verses plural aspect. I think that since there are three different types (de supra, de citra, and de ultra), plural would be more appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venicescapes (talk • contribs) 16:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Frederic Lane and Edward Muir both manage to avoid the whole issue by simply not translating San Marco which makes the question of the genitive moot. They write procurators of San Marco. This may actually be a better solution.Venicescapes (talk) 08:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.