Talk:Product structure modeling

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved to Product structure modeling. Favonian (talk) 17:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Product Structure Modeling → Product structure modelling –

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Matches the formatting of related article titles. Tony  (talk)  13:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: Per WP:ENGVAR, there is no reason to change modeling to modelling. Some standardized rigour (talk) 07:41, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Support moving to Product structure modeling per WP:CAPS and WP:ENGVAR (ghastly as it looks with only one l). Jenks24 (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.