Talk:Proexaeretodon

Revalidated?
The article says the species (and hence genus) was revalidated. However, the source given says "we consider P. vincei to be valid. Nonetheless, we are aware that a deep revision and stronger evidence is needed to support or reject the synonymy of these taxon [sic]." I've fixed the taxobox by creating a taxonomy template, but I think this article is premature. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)