Talk:Professional File System

I'm not sure but I think the first line may be POV. Ozone 19:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * May be, but doesn't have to. You can compare perfomance in equality of testing (same OS, hard disk, processor, ram, etc). &mdash;Claunia 20:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It would be better if it specified which filesystems it performs well against(OFS, FFS, SFS?)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Professional File System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.amigalife.info/inediti/inediti2-prove2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Trashcan
I'd just like to point out that there's absolutely no doubt that PFS was the first Amiga filesystem to introduce a filesystem-level "trashcan", as it was a) an Amiga filesystem with a filesystem-level trashcan and (b) was the second Amiga filesystem (if you consider OFS/FFS to be a single one) and OFS/FFS did not have one. I think there were a grand total of four native filesystems on original Amiga so it's not exactly a stretch to claim.

An example of how Wikipedia is completely unsuitable for publishing anything Amiga-related, due to the paucity of modern third-party references. Citation is needed but can never be supplied. 2.217.212.107 (talk) 14:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Amiga magazines of the 80s/90s are suitable as reliable sources... so check your library and provide needed sources. Pavlor (talk) 05:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Amiga magazines rarely go into the technical detail required. 146.191.95.1 (talk) 13:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I would question if old Amiga magazines out of print would fall within wikipedia's notability guidelines. Generally one might expect to be able to read and confirm references. 90.192.220.55 (talk) 21:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Offline sources are perfectly useable (note many Amiga magazines/scans are available online). I participated in dozens AfDs and nobody ever disputed good old computer magazines as sources proving notability (see WP:RS and WP:N for more general info). Pavlor (talk) 05:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)