Talk:Professor in accounting

from VfD:

A job description, not an encyclopedia article. RickK 08:07, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Bah, Delete. Grox 11:44, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Valid topic, but cleanup and move to Accounting scholarship or somesuch. Martg76 23:35, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC).
 * Keep as redirect to discourage the recreation of the article as a job description.Martg76 00:20, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Wyss 04:10, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Would be valid as a profession description, hence I concur with Martg76 - move & cleanup keep as a redirect - Skysmith 11:25, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, else we see job descriptions on WP. Next we'll see "click here to apply for this job". Keep the article as it is merged with accounting scholarship. Move useful content to Accounting scholarship. Keep would retain the article title. --Deathphoenix 22:46, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:23, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I cleaned up up the page and moved what remained of it to accounting scholarship. Those who have already cast their votes are encouraged to have another look. Martg76 03:34, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * This is not a save: the title inherantly states a defective factoring of the info. No one should change their vote bcz of the content having gone into a potentially valid article. On principle, i am nominating the new title for VfD tho i have no opinion yet on its retention. --Jerzy(t) 22:06, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)
 * Del. Wrong way to factor the info is implicit in the title; changing title to Redir does not remove the title from the jurisdiction of VfD. --Jerzy(t) 22:06, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)

end moved discussion