Talk:Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer

[Untitled]
I am unsure of how to categorize this page, for the reason that i believe it to be heuristic, yet neuroheuristic more over, and there really is no category for this. I may have to create one later. I have also left things unfinished, such as footnotes or notation. I don't know how to do that yet, and will learn shortly. Wiki help pages said I can just toss the info on, and someone will come and fix it. As long as pages numbers and where i got it from are noted.

Zos 19:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

not bad but umm, i dont think its appropriate to put this in neuroscience at all (pseudoscience if anything.) Is there a category for cognitive development? evolutionary psychology? new age/occult books? Also wouldn't this fall under the grounds of semiotics? And no, I haven't even read the book.

Oh also, theres a bit of a super geeky pun on the front page, "help improve the human biocomputer by expanding it"! (I love it!) Universal Logic (talk) 07:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It's more Category:Philosophy of mind. And easier to categorize as a book. Since 'human biocomputer' is really only used by Lilly, it's impossible to properly source as a concept, so I've moved it to the book title. Skyerise (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)