Talk:Programming with Big Data in R

Trimmed from lead
These afterthoughts at the bottom of the lead are not adding clarity IMO, so I've trimmed them off, until someone figures out a way to sort this out enough to make it a value add.

It is clear that pbdR is not only suitable for small clusters, but is also more stable for analyzing big data and more scalable for supercomputers.[third-party source needed] In short, pbdR
 * does not like Rmpi, snow, snowfall, do-like,[clarification needed] nor parallel packages in R,
 * does not focus on interactive computing nor master/workers,
 * but is able to use both SPMD and task parallelisms.

&mdash; MaxEnt 04:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

The actual markup:

It is clear that pbdR is not only suitable for small clusters, but is also more stable for analyzing big data and more scalable for supercomputers. In short, pbdR
 * does not like Rmpi, nor parallel packages in R,
 * does not focus on interactive computing nor master/workers,
 * but is able to use both SPMD and task parallelisms.

Probably the restored version needs to begin "According to D. Schmidt, et al, R is suitable for $purpose.

Then the three verbs 'like', 'focus', and 'able' need to revised into encyclopedia tone. &mdash; MaxEnt 04:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)