Talk:Proguanil

Improvements to Proguanil article
Student editors: Lois.chung, Floal1, Collierpharmd, Hwhittemore13 will be making the following improvements and edits:

Lois.chung will be addressing the "Mechanism" section. Elaborating on mechanism details.

Floal1 will be addressing the "Precautions" section. Adding information on liver precautions.

Collierpharmd will be addressing the "Introduction" section. Will be adding a bit of history, and moving other information to appropriate sections.

Hwhittemore13 will be addressing the "Medical uses" section. Elaborating on populations and uses.

Collierpharmd (talk) 19:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Peer review: STUDENT 4
Is there any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation? We found no apparent evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation. Hjkim1988 (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review- Student 1
'''Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify… '''

Yes, throughout the article they seemed to keep a neutral point of view.

Nishp14 (talk) 00:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Peer review: Student 3
Precautions section: Recommending monitoring of certain labs may not be appropriate for Wikipedia Medical uses section: Perhaps there can be a citation on the pricing for mefloquine vs. Proguanil

Piadizon (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Student 2
Question – Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely accessible? If not, specify…

Answer- Not all the points that were included were verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely accessible.

The following citations were not accessible at all: [2] [4] [9] [19] The following were not from secondary sources: [1]: prescribing info [5]: primary lit [8]: primary lit [14]: primary lit [17]: primary lit [18]: primary lit

MitraFazel (talk) 00:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Sources that were previously mentioned as inaccessible (question 2) were double checked - free PDF versions of the articles are in fact available through the website by following links on the right hand portion of the web page. Source [4] - although the full article is not available, the referenced information can be seen in the abstract, however, I still replaced the source with a more accessible, up-to-date reference.

Collierpharmd (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)