Talk:ProjectLibre

Deleted "LibreOffice" affiliation
I just deleted this sentence: "ProjectLibre is supportive of LibreOffice; it complements their replacement of Microsoft Office components.". Not only that the source for this is missing since a long time, but there are sources which show that this is just a wish, but far from being reality. See e.g.:
 * http://www.projectlibre.org/discussion/shouldnt-projectlibre-be-fused-libre-office-or-open-office
 * http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Introducing-ProjectLibre-compliment-to-LibreOffice-and-replaces-Microsoft-Project-td4069880.html

In general it would be beneficial if the article would be less advertisement and more encyclopedia. --Tomakos (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Manual for ProjectLibre
I was wondering whether the wiki would be a good platform to make a Manual for the ProjectLibre, open source project management software? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardsong (talk • contribs) 04:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Ardsong! No, Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia and this the wrong place for software manuals. The equivalent of Wikipedia but for books would be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikibooks, which is run by the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia, just as Wikipedia. For writing a manual for ProjectLibre I would suggest either to use Wikibooks or to self-host a wiki software on the ProjectLibre website. Examples for such wiki software for self-hosting would be e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki, which is the same wiki software that wikipedia uses, or any other wiki software listed e.g. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_wiki_software --46.103.231.186 (talk) 16:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Advertisements versus Sources
Advertisements are primary sources TEDickey (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)