Talk:Project A119/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Astrocog (talk • contribs • count ) 00:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Review in progress.AstroCog (talk) 00:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Nice article overall. Does what it needs to do.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Good writing overall. Prose gets to the point.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Plenty of reliable references, well cited.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * No problems here.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No problems here.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Seems fairly stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * It's got images. Not sure what other images could improve the article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This one was pretty easy. After reading