Talk:Project Cumulus

This needs expansion
After creating the article via the AfC process, I added some "for further reading" material. This needs some expansion and better tie-ins with related articles. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  02:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Guardian/BBC source
I've reverted an edit because it was based upon a POV not apparent in the source(s). I've expanded my previous edit to address user:Dbrodbeck concerns. However I do not echo user:Dbrodbecks opinion that the edit should be reverted because of the POV that "if there is no mention of cloud seeding, this is a non issue." The nature of the cited sources links the cloud-seeding project to new dates, one day before the incident, and preliminary environmental evidence alleged to be related to cloud seeding.

Material removed
I've also removed possible vandalism information that I determined to be 'inaccurate.'  According to the sources, there is no evidence of any conspiracy theory beliefs in these articles and the inclusion of material blaming conspiracy theorist for the what was reported as evidence that records are missing was added without any supporting information to back it up. Therefore, I've removed it. However, a covert action by nature requires a conspiracy.Johnvr4 (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)