Talk:Project Moonbase (podcast)

Notability
Project Moonbase seems to be notable enough to merit its own article based on the following reasons:
 * It is "one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style" (retrofuturism).
 * The show has been running as long as the other shows highlighted in the history of podcasting article.
 * The article has an appropriate level of detail, supported with inline sources.
 * It acts as a broader gestalt article incorporating several separate entities that may not be notable separately, including: a radio show, a podcast, original music releases/performances, a television show, a graphic artist, a health campaign. (Hence, the normal advice to merge a non-notable subject in to another article has effectively already been followed.)

Also, I realise that many references are to the show's own website, but that's mainly for individual episodes, which seems pertinent. If I were to remove all links to individual episodes, then the references section would appear more balanced to a casual editor, but I don't think that an article should be criticised for being sourced thoroughly.

PhilipBroughtonMills (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)